MODELEM2RS-A882Stepper drive
CONFLICT DETECTED
Supply voltage & output current
PRODUCT PAGEHeader summary
20–80 VDC · 7.0 ASAME PAGETechnical Data
18–80 VAC / 30–110 VDC · 8.2 AOFFICIAL PDFUser manual
20–80 VAC / 30–100 VDC · 8.2 AProduct-spec consistency checks for export manufacturers
Find conflicting product specifications across your website and PDFs.
We compare technical specifications—such as range, voltage, temperature, and accuracy—across product pages, datasheets, and page sections. Every finding includes the original text, source URL or PDF page, and evidence for your product team to review.
We reply whether or not we find an issue. Your email is used only to send the result.
- Public pages only
- Human-reviewed findings
- No CMS or PIM access
We flag contradictions. See what each finding includes →
BUILT FOR SPEC-DENSE CATALOGS
- PRODUCT PAGES
- PUBLIC PDFs
- PAGE SECTIONS
- UNIT NORMALIZATION
- HUMAN REVIEW
01 / WHAT YOU GET
Evidence your product team can act on.
Not another generic website score. Each finding identifies the conflicting field, the published values, and where each value appears so your product, engineering, and web teams can verify it quickly.
Field and published values
See the product model, conflicting field, and both values exactly as published.
Value A / BSource evidence
Open the source URL or PDF page and review the original text and screenshot.
URL / PDF p.12Review status
Every result includes the scan date, confidence level, and a clear review status.
Owner reviewWHY IT HELPS
Your team can move directly from a reported conflict to the exact public statements that need confirmation.
02 / THE WORKFLOW
What happens after you submit your website?
We start with one public model and reply whether or not we find an issue.
- 01yourfactory.com
Select one public model
We choose a product with enough public material for a meaningful consistency check.
- 02HTMLSKUPDF
Match pages and PDFs
We connect public assets only when the product-model identity is sufficiently clear.
- 03
1000 kPa=1 MPaNormalize & review
We normalize units and configurations, compare specifications, and manually review candidates.
- 04✓URLPDF p.12
Email the result
We send the evidence—or state that no obvious conflict was found in the reviewed material.
03 / CHECK SCOPE
Technical facts only.
No vague AI critique.
We focus on facts that affect selection and quoting. We do not grade your writing, redesign your website, or claim to know which public value is correct.
See the pilot scopeFIELDS WE CHECK
Model identityRange limitsVoltageCurrentPowerTemperaturePressureFlowDimensionsDN / NPSOutput interfaceIP rating
OUT OF SCOPE
SEO scoring · translation style · visual redesign · certification validity
04 / EARLY EVIDENCE
We have repeatedly found these issues on real industrial websites.
In a directed scan of 20 industrial websites, we identified 11 high-confidence specification conflicts or asset mismatches. The sites were deliberately selected, so this is not an industry-wide incidence estimate.
industrial sites reviewed
Automation, instrumentation, electrical equipment, pumps, and valves.
with a high-confidence conflict or asset mismatch
Each supported by two public statements that could be independently checked.
One table showed 40–125°C; the page copy showed−40–125°C.
A missing negative sign can change whether a product appears suitable for low-temperature use.
Public-source examples do not imply that the companies shown are SpecDrift customers or partners. The manufacturer must confirm the authoritative value.
05 / PILOT SERVICE
Start with one free model.
Expand only if the result is useful.
We check one public product model, include source evidence and human review, and reply whether or not an issue is found.
$0one public model
free check
free check
$49 PILOT SCAN · UP TO 30 PRODUCTS
- Up to 30 products
- Product pages and public PDFs
- Structured findings list
- Source evidence for every finding
- Human-reviewed confidence labels
06 / PRACTICAL GUIDES
Fix the process behind specification drift.
Field-tested methods for finding datasheet mismatches and preventing conflicting product data from returning after the first correction.
Datasheet vs product page mismatch: a practical audit method
Separate real conflicts from unit conversions, configuration differences, and obsolete files—while preserving evidence for the product owner.
Read the mismatch guideIndustrial product data quality checklist
A release-ready checklist for model identity, units, operating conditions, PDF revisions, localized pages, and correction ownership.
Use the quality checklist07 / FAQ
Questions before your first check.
What counts as a specification conflict?
Two public statements tied to the same model that cannot both hold after unit normalization—for example, different maximum pressures or voltage ranges.
What if the values describe different configurations?
If a configuration boundary can explain the difference, the finding is downgraded or withdrawn. Unclear grouping is reported as an identity or configuration risk, not a confirmed conflict.
Do you decide which specification is correct?
No. SpecDrift proves that public statements disagree and preserves the evidence. Your product or engineering owner confirms the authoritative value.
Do you need access to our CMS or PIM?
No. The pilot uses only public pages and public PDFs. We do not need CMS, PIM, or server access.
Will you reply if no issue is found?
Yes. We will tell you when the check finds no obvious conflict and state which model and public materials were reviewed.
Who operates SpecDrift?
SpecDrift is a pilot-stage service operated by Ted Huang. It focuses on technical specification consistency across export manufacturers’ public product materials.